<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two critical patches for Rails 1.2.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yanpritzker.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/</link>
	<description>photographer, entrepreneur, software engineer, musician, skier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yan</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/comment-page-1/#comment-3136</link>
		<dc:creator>yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/#comment-3136</guid>
		<description>First patch is no good in 1-2-stable. You guys applied a different patch which fixed the has_many through push but did not fix the delete. You should probably apply the patch that was actually attached to ticket 6466...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First patch is no good in 1-2-stable. You guys applied a different patch which fixed the has_many through push but did not fix the delete. You should probably apply the patch that was actually attached to ticket 6466&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yan</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>I guess what was not clear to me is that I should be running 1-2-stable? My understanding is that if I wanted the latest rails I should be freezing TAG 1-2-2 because that was the last official announced release. I also assumed any critical errors such as the routing should be backpatched into that TAG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what was not clear to me is that I should be running 1-2-stable? My understanding is that if I wanted the latest rails I should be freezing TAG 1-2-2 because that was the last official announced release. I also assumed any critical errors such as the routing should be backpatched into that TAG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/2007/03/12/two-critical-patches-for-rails-122/#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>The first patch was applied about a week ago, and the routing patch was applied 3 months ago.  Looks like the routing patch didn&#039;t make it into the stable branch for whatever reason.  You can always elevate these issues on the rails-core list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first patch was applied about a week ago, and the routing patch was applied 3 months ago.  Looks like the routing patch didn&#8217;t make it into the stable branch for whatever reason.  You can always elevate these issues on the rails-core list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.230 seconds -->
