<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good customer service means replying to email immediately</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yanpritzker.com/2008/06/03/good-customer-service-means-replying-to-email-immediately/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2008/06/03/good-customer-service-means-replying-to-email-immediately/</link>
	<description>photographer, entrepreneur, software engineer, musician, skier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yan</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2008/06/03/good-customer-service-means-replying-to-email-immediately/comment-page-1/#comment-11896</link>
		<dc:creator>yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/?p=162#comment-11896</guid>
		<description>No, I think the response should be completely human and address the particular problem at hand. Autoresponders to me are as bad as not responding at all, because it means that you have no idea that your message was actually received. The response should be quick but should mention the user&#039;s particular issue and how you&#039;re resolving it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I think the response should be completely human and address the particular problem at hand. Autoresponders to me are as bad as not responding at all, because it means that you have no idea that your message was actually received. The response should be quick but should mention the user&#8217;s particular issue and how you&#8217;re resolving it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Mazo</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2008/06/03/good-customer-service-means-replying-to-email-immediately/comment-page-1/#comment-11895</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Mazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/?p=162#comment-11895</guid>
		<description>Autoresponders have been around for years.  Are you advocating more human sounding auto responders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autoresponders have been around for years.  Are you advocating more human sounding auto responders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://yanpritzker.com/2008/06/03/good-customer-service-means-replying-to-email-immediately/comment-page-1/#comment-11893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skwpspace.com/?p=162#comment-11893</guid>
		<description>This is so true. As a supervisor for technical support, I can&#039;t tell you the number of times a simple &quot;Let me look into it and get back to you at 3pm&quot; (or whatever time) solves any problems with the attitude of an angry customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true. As a supervisor for technical support, I can&#8217;t tell you the number of times a simple &#8220;Let me look into it and get back to you at 3pm&#8221; (or whatever time) solves any problems with the attitude of an angry customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

